(no subject)
Nov. 1st, 2004 11:42 pmThis is why I will never cast a vote on a machine that does not generate some form of hardcopy.
http://www.local6.com/news/3879408/detail.html
What would they have done if this had happened on a paperless voting machine?
How likely do you think it is that it's going to happen tomorrow? How likely do you think it is that it's already happened?
And will we ever know?
http://www.local6.com/news/3879408/detail.html
What would they have done if this had happened on a paperless voting machine?
How likely do you think it is that it's going to happen tomorrow? How likely do you think it is that it's already happened?
And will we ever know?
no subject
Date: 2004-11-02 05:45 am (UTC)it's a lose-lose situation *shrug*
no subject
Date: 2004-11-02 07:12 am (UTC)As for deliberately "losing" ballots, to have any significant effect, that would take a conspiracy, and conspiracies usually have a way of eventually coming to light.
My point is not that paper ballots are not a problem - in many ways, they are. My point is that electronic-only voting machines, especially as currently implemented are not the solution...
no subject
Date: 2004-11-02 09:04 am (UTC)I agree with ya; too easy for local machines (either party) to rig them, and we all know how reliable electronic media can be.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-02 10:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-02 11:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-02 12:29 pm (UTC)