ximinez: (Default)
ximinez ([personal profile] ximinez) wrote2006-05-04 10:30 am

Plan B vs. the Right Wingnuts

http://susiebright.blogs.com/susie_brights_journal_/2006/05/the_b_spot.html (possibly NSFW images (don't know b/c I have them turned off for this site from work))

http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2006/04/why_the_wingnuts_hate_plan_b.php (SFW)

This is an issue on which we can completely ignore any assertion that life begins at fertilization (which I personally find absurd), because it's irrelevant: fertilization doesn't take place. No zygote, no fetus, no embryo, no babies. The claim that this argument is about the life of a baby is null and void, and the opposition to Plan B makes it glaringly, brilliantly clear that this isn't about the sanctity of life at all: it's all about controlling a woman's ovaries. She will not be allowed to tamper with the timing of ovulation.

[identity profile] knobody.livejournal.com 2006-05-04 03:38 pm (UTC)(link)
there is a problem with this argument, and i believe it's the one that the right wingnuts have the biggest beef with. what if the egg has already been released? fertilization can take place up to 24 or 36 (depending on your source) after ovulation and can happen in as little as two hours after unprotected sex. so, someone has sex, ovulates (and some theorize that sex can trigger ovulation to a limited extent), fertilization takes place, then the next morning someone takes plan b. plan b then possibly prevents implantation of the zygote (according to their own web site). for the "life begins at conception" people it is morally wrong to prevent implantation of a fertilized zygote. the fact that this happens naturally is irrelevent to them. if god takes care of it, then it's his choice, but when people interfere then that is Bad(tm).

i'm not saying i agree with them, but they do have a point that is not mentioned by the above. to be consistent with the theory that life begins at conception and doing anything to prevent that life is wrong, then opposing plan b is the logical view.

[identity profile] cadrys.livejournal.com 2006-05-04 04:33 pm (UTC)(link)
...reason number thirty-seven why I don't self-label as "Republican"

[identity profile] tealfroglette.livejournal.com 2006-05-04 05:18 pm (UTC)(link)
hey! i self label as radioactive squirrel! :) wooot!
ext_79170: Headshot from 2005 (Default)

[identity profile] dragonbane.livejournal.com 2006-05-04 06:07 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm going to stick with "Cute Fuzzy Weasel." :)

...Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines...

[identity profile] kittykatkatja.livejournal.com 2006-05-05 05:04 am (UTC)(link)
Poor baby, someone else is called a weasel, too. *smooches*

[identity profile] kittykatkatja.livejournal.com 2006-05-05 02:24 pm (UTC)(link)
Um, it was actually "Go at it like"..., but you've apparently translated it in your head, and _then_ said it out loud. :-P

[identity profile] kittykatkatja.livejournal.com 2006-05-04 06:50 pm (UTC)(link)
I'll stick with "Cute Fuzzy Weasel," too :)