Plan B vs. the Right Wingnuts
May. 4th, 2006 10:30 amhttp://susiebright.blogs.com/susie_brights_journal_/2006/05/the_b_spot.html (possibly NSFW images (don't know b/c I have them turned off for this site from work))
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2006/04/why_the_wingnuts_hate_plan_b.php (SFW)
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2006/04/why_the_wingnuts_hate_plan_b.php (SFW)
This is an issue on which we can completely ignore any assertion that life begins at fertilization (which I personally find absurd), because it's irrelevant: fertilization doesn't take place. No zygote, no fetus, no embryo, no babies. The claim that this argument is about the life of a baby is null and void, and the opposition to Plan B makes it glaringly, brilliantly clear that this isn't about the sanctity of life at all: it's all about controlling a woman's ovaries. She will not be allowed to tamper with the timing of ovulation.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-04 03:38 pm (UTC)i'm not saying i agree with them, but they do have a point that is not mentioned by the above. to be consistent with the theory that life begins at conception and doing anything to prevent that life is wrong, then opposing plan b is the logical view.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-04 04:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-04 04:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-04 04:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-04 05:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-04 05:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-04 06:07 pm (UTC)...Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines...
no subject
Date: 2006-05-04 06:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-05 05:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-05 01:36 pm (UTC)Did I just say that out loud?
no subject
Date: 2006-05-05 02:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-05 03:08 pm (UTC)But that's ok, because we both dropped "crazed". ;)
no subject
Date: 2006-05-04 06:50 pm (UTC)